Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation

From: John Gray <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation
Date: 2002-04-15 18:03:58
Message-ID: 1018893841.1380.76.camel@adzuki (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 06:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> John Gray <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > Patch attached in line with my previous statement on -hackers about
> > reorganisation of files in the commands directory. (Note that define.c
> > has been kept, holding some of the common support code for define
> > routines.)
> Patch applied.

> I believe you also had plans for refactoring the ALTER TABLE routines to
> eliminate duplicate coding?
I'd had some discussion with Christopher Kings-Lynne on this. He felt
(and it seemed a good idea) that we could do that once the file
rearrangement was done - I will be looking at that again over the next
couple of days.



In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2002-04-15 18:24:51
Subject: Re: Alter/update large tables - VERRRY annoying behaviour!
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2002-04-15 17:42:02
Subject: Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group