Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

newbie: renaming sequences task

From: craigp <craigp98072(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: newbie: renaming sequences task
Date: 2008-03-02 10:36:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi -

I was perusing the todo list to see some easy items that I might help out on (and get up to speed on postgres hacking)... one of them (with %) seems to lead to another:

      o %Have ALTER TABLE RENAME rename SERIAL sequence names
      o Have ALTER SEQUENCE RENAME rename the sequence name stored in the sequence table

and perhaps this one as well:

  Consider placing all sequences in a single table, or create a system view

I read through the mailing list links (they seem to culminate with these two):

But I'm left a bit confused on what, if anything, can or should be done. Maybe this isn't the best item to start with? If I had some more direction, it might be straightforward enough.

One thing I did notice: sequence names are stored in both pg_type.typname and pg_class.relkind. I presume both tables would need to be updated, unless we remove the redundancy? Why can they not be updated within a single transaction (easily)? What sort of restructuring would be needed to separate out the transactional vs non-transactional aspects?


Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: craigpDate: 2008-03-02 10:46:24
Subject: Re: newbie: renaming sequences task
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-02 00:51:01
Subject: Re: "could not open relation 1663/16384/16584: No such file or directory" in a specific combination of transactions with temp tables

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group