Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c )

From: Alessio Bragadini <alessio(at)albourne(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c )
Date: 2002-02-28 10:14:32
Message-ID: 1014891273.1649.351.camel@iris (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 06:44, Tom Lane wrote:

> Hmm.  I'd surely be the last to claim that CVS is the be-all and end-all
> of software archiving systems.  But is BitKeeper, or arch, or anything
> else enough better to justify the pain of switching?  This is intended
> as an honest question, not flamebait --- I haven't looked closely at
> the alternatives.

There was a discussion on Slashdot a couple of weeks ago, with (as
usual) some interesting comments out of the lot. It's at
including comments from Subversion's Karl Fogel.

Alessio F. Bragadini		alessio(at)albourne(dot)com
APL Financial Services
Nicosia, Cyprus		 	phone: +357-22-755750

"It is more complicated than you think"
		-- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2002-02-28 12:46:38
Subject: Re: Oracle vs PostgreSQL in real life
Previous:From: Miguel A. =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ar=E9valo?=Date: 2002-02-28 09:40:13
Subject: Clues about tables fileformat

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group