| From: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, rnathan_tg(at)bigfoot(dot)com, pgsql novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: pgaccess connection problems] |
| Date: | 2002-01-30 06:58:47 |
| Message-ID: | 1012373930.17978.43.camel@linda |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 23:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> Not sure that that's 100% true. If you tell any of these programs to
> connect to host "localhost", they will certainly go via TCP --- and
> hence fail if the postmaster hasn't got -i. But on at least some of
> the GUI interfaces, putting an empty entry in the "host" dialog box
> will result in a Unix-socket connection not a TCP connection to
> localhost. (The Unix-socket method is what psql and pgdump use by
> default.) For that, you don't need -i.
>
> Dunno if that applies to pgaccess, but try it.
It does.
--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
"The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of
temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of
judgment to be punished;" II Peter 2:9
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Thompson | 2002-01-30 09:21:17 | Transactions |
| Previous Message | Sharon Cowling | 2002-01-30 01:47:00 | Function Problem |