Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug in org.postgresql.Connection

From: Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
To: Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in org.postgresql.Connection
Date: 2001-12-07 23:05:53
Message-ID: 1007766353.30152.5.camel@osti.knowledgenet.corp (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Ugh, sorry. My email didn't make sense, as I read it.  I should know
better than trying to communicate late on a Friday....

The problem is typeOidCache is used in getSQLType(int) rather than
sqlTypeCache.  Diff is here.

[wolpert(at)osti jdbc]$ cvs diff -e org/postgresql/
Index: org/postgresql/
RCS file:
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -e -r1.39
                Integer sqlType = (Integer)sqlTypeCache.get(new

On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 15:39, Ned Wolpert wrote:
> This was right on the tip of my sight, but I missed it in my last email
> message:
> Bug in the method getSQLType(int oid).  It looks for an integer in
>    Integer sqlType = (Integer)typeOidCache.get(iOid);
> But when none found, it does a query to the database to get the value. 
> But it never puts it into the hashtable/cache.  The method does the
> following:
>    sqlTypeCache.put(iOid, sqlType);
>    pgTypeCache.put(iOid, pgType);
> One of two things should happend.  
>   1) change line (1118) from 
>          sqlTypeCache.put(iOid,sqlType);
>      to  
>          typeOidCache.put(iOid,sqlType);
>   or
>   2) add in the line
>          typeOidCache.put(iOid,sqlType);
>      in line 1118
> My question is, that sqlTypeCache is only used here, but typeOidCache is
> used in several places.  Should we remove sqlTypeCache and only use
> typeOidCache or are both needed?
> -- 
> Virtually, 
> Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
> D08C2F45:  28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51  3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45 

Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>

D08C2F45:  28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51  3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45 

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Thomas O'DowdDate: 2001-12-08 05:40:51
Subject: patch against cvs for getTimestamp() problem.
Previous:From: Ned WolpertDate: 2001-12-07 22:39:26
Subject: Bug in org.postgresql.Connection

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group