| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: wait event and archive_command |
| Date: | 2021-11-22 01:31:57 |
| Message-ID: | 0e69bf65-9f5e-b4e5-d888-22e5b67467f2@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/11/20 0:19, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/11/19 16:54, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:04:57AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
>>> Yeah let's not do that. I'm fine with the
>>> wait_event_for_archive_command_v2.patch as is.
>>
>> Switched the patch as RfC, then.
>
> Thanks! Barring any objection, I will commit the patch.
Pushed. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Nancarrow | 2021-11-22 01:44:48 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-11-22 01:23:15 | Re: using extended statistics to improve join estimates |