| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support |
| Date: | 2018-01-27 22:00:17 |
| Message-ID: | 0d8936e1-ebb5-f0d1-929b-6c7ff4df51b9@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/25/18 09:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 1/19/18 13:43, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Comparing the existing {be,fe}-secure-openssl.c with the proposed
>> {be,fe}-secure-gnutls.c, and with half an eye on the previously proposed
>> Apple Secure Transport implementation, I have identified a few more
>> areas of refactoring that should be done in order to avoid excessive
>> copy-and-pasting in the new implementations:
>
> And here is another place that needs cleaning up, where the OpenSSL API
> was used directly.
And here is another one. The last one for now I think.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Refactor-client-side-SSL-certificate-checking-code.patch | text/plain | 16.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-01-27 22:05:14 | Re: [HACKERS] generated columns |
| Previous Message | Vik Fearing | 2018-01-27 21:54:07 | Re: \describe* |