Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
Date: 2018-01-27 22:00:17
Message-ID: 0d8936e1-ebb5-f0d1-929b-6c7ff4df51b9@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/25/18 09:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 1/19/18 13:43, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Comparing the existing {be,fe}-secure-openssl.c with the proposed
>> {be,fe}-secure-gnutls.c, and with half an eye on the previously proposed
>> Apple Secure Transport implementation, I have identified a few more
>> areas of refactoring that should be done in order to avoid excessive
>> copy-and-pasting in the new implementations:
>
> And here is another place that needs cleaning up, where the OpenSSL API
> was used directly.

And here is another one. The last one for now I think.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Refactor-client-side-SSL-certificate-checking-code.patch text/plain 16.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-27 22:05:14 Re: [HACKERS] generated columns
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2018-01-27 21:54:07 Re: \describe*