Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2016-12-12 17:45:38
Message-ID: 0d5b64c9-fa05-4dab-93e7-56576d1193ca@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Huh, this code is broken as well. We have to ignore partitions that don't
have any subpartitions. Patch is attached below (v2).

--
Dmitry Ivanov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
hacky_partitioning_hotfix_v2.diff text/x-patch 1.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-12-12 18:05:59 Re: Nested Wait Events?
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2016-12-12 17:45:27 Re: exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Tracking wait event for latches)