Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types

From: Peter Moser <pitiz29a(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anton Dignös <anton(dot)dignoes(at)unibz(dot)it>, Johann Gamper <gamper(at)inf(dot)unibz(dot)it>, Michael Böhlen <boehlen(at)ifi(dot)uzh(dot)ch>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Date: 2016-12-16 13:55:42
Message-ID: 0b2f37cf-8c85-e49a-db14-319edf0f7397@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am 16.12.2016 um 07:17 schrieb David Fetter:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 03:57:33PM +0100, Peter Moser wrote:
>> Am 05.12.2016 um 06:11 schrieb Haribabu Kommi:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Peter Moser <pitiz29a(at)gmail(dot)com
>>> <mailto:pitiz29a(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> We decided to follow your recommendation and add the patch to the
>>> commitfest.
>>>
>>>
>>> Path is not applying properly to HEAD.
>>> Moved to next CF with "waiting on author" status.
>>>
>>
>> We updated our patch. We tested it with the latest
>> commit dfe530a09226a9de80f2b4c3d5f667bf51481c49.
>
> This looks neat, but it no longer applies to master. Is a rebase in
> the offing?

We rebased our patch on top of HEAD, that is, commit
93513d1b6559b2d0805f0b02d312ee550e3d010b.

Best regards,
Anton, Johann, Michael, Peter

Attachment Content-Type Size
tpg_primitives_out_v3.patch text/x-patch 116.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-12-16 14:24:54 Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 0/1] PostgreSQL db: Retry on constraint violation [and 2 more messages] [and 1 more messages]
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2016-12-16 13:42:57 Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.