Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum (off-topic?)

From: <me(at)alternize(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>,"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Mark Kirkwood" <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>,"Michael Crozier" <crozierm(at)conducivetech(dot)com>,<pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum (off-topic?)
Date: 2006-01-20 17:46:45
Message-ID: 0a0c01c61de9$7bc56f80$0201a8c0@iwing (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
> Sure... I've never been asked to consult on our stuff, and in any case,
> I don't do web front-ends (one of the nice things about working with a
> team of other consultants). AFAIK IIS will happily talk to PostgreSQL
> (though maybe I'm wrong there...)

iis (yeah, asp in a successfull productive environement hehe) & postgresql 
works even better for us than iis & mssql :-)

- thomas 

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: AntoineDate: 2006-01-20 18:32:34
Subject: query stopped working after tables > 50000 records
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-01-20 17:44:16
Subject: Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum (off-topic?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group