On Aug 9, 2004, at 8:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
>> I think Jeff's original point was that he wanted some kind of index
>> for all functions, not just ones you already know how to classify.
> I thought his point was that he didn't fully know how the docs have
> already classified functions, and therefore didn't know which page to
> look on to find a given one. This seems a legitimate gripe to me, and
> one that can be cured with a more complete index.
or if you are trying to remember a function - say "Oh whats that thing?
Colace? Coerce? [scrolls] Ahh! Coalesce!"
The trouble seems to be getting that list automatically generated from
the existing SGML.
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Paramveer.Singh||Date: 2004-08-11 11:40:38|
|Subject: documentation for libplpgsql|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-08-10 00:20:59|
|Subject: Re: Suggestion on reorganizing functions |