Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: listagg aggregate

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Date: 2010-01-29 18:47:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Jan 29, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Robert Haas wrote:

>> I did and revised them slightly. There isn't much, just a brief comment in the table of aggregate functions. The documentation for all the functions on that page could use a little love, frankly.
> Want to take a short at it?

ENOTUITS! /me is already sorely over-committed…


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2010-01-29 18:52:07
Subject: Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Treey
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-29 18:46:50
Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group