Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data
Date: 2018-04-08 19:09:01
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On April 8, 2018 10:19:59 AM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> There were a couple more catalog changes that broke patch context, so
>> attached is version 16.
>Pushed with a few more adjustments (mostly, another round of
>on bki.sgml). Now we wait to see what the buildfarm thinks,
>about the MSVC build ...
>Congratulations, and many thanks, to John for seeing this through!
>I know it's been a huge amount of work, but we've needed this for

Seconded and thirded and fourthed (?)!
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2018-04-08 21:23:21 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-04-08 19:03:32 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.