Re: Covering GiST indexes

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Covering GiST indexes
Date: 2019-01-29 18:58:06
Message-ID: 0AADE118-6CFA-465B-AF7B-AEDECA79BDFA@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 29 янв. 2019 г., в 23:43, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> написал(а):
>
> On 29/01/2019 18.45, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>> Also, I've unified gist and r-tree syntax tests for INCLUDE.
>
> Why not just keep it simple? The purpose is not to test the GiST indexes, for that we have index_including_gist.sql.
>
> I propose the following.

Indeed, it's quite strange to check that GiST cannot be built without GiST opclass.

PFA patch without redundant checks.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Covering-GiST-v9.patch application/octet-stream 29.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-01-29 18:59:39 Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Andreas Karlsson 2019-01-29 18:43:10 Re: Covering GiST indexes