Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plpython3

From: James William Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>
To: Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpython3
Date: 2010-02-01 22:35:38
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Feb 1, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Nathan Boley wrote:

>> I think it would be great for you to review it... I doubt that will
>> cause it to get committed for 9.0, but my doubt is no reason for you
>> to hold off reviewing it.
> I assumed so, but the pretense of a chance will probably help to motivate me :-)
> I'll have something by Thursday, and then 'Returned with Feedback'
> will at least be factual.

I haven't updated the plpython3 branch in a while, so you may want to hit the github repo with the PGXS build:

...Should probably get the updated docs published too, but they are available in src/documentation as ReST files. If you have sphinx installed, running `make html` in the root project directory should build them into src/sphinx/html.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-02-01 23:11:43
Subject: Re: Database-Role settings behaviour and docs mismatch
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-02-01 22:32:07
Subject: Database-Role settings behaviour and docs mismatch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group