From: | <me(at)alternize(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Philippe Lang" <philippe(dot)lang(at)attiksystem(dot)ch>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Thanks Ludek! |
Date: | 2005-12-20 16:54:48 |
Message-ID: | 055301c60586$169507e0$0201a8c0@iwing |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
you're absolutely right. although being a passive reader most the times
(well, i just can't find anymore bugs ;-)) i appreciate all the people's
work of making pgsqlODBC even greater.
thanks all and "frohi wiehnachte" from switzerland,
thomas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philippe Lang" <philippe(dot)lang(at)attiksystem(dot)ch>
To: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 5:23 PM
Subject: [ODBC] Thanks Ludek!
> Ludek,
>
> I'm amazed almost every day when I read how active you are, here in this
> newsgroup, with the development of the ODBC driver. I'd like to thank you
> for that. A stable PGSQL ODBC driver is the key for many of us here, doing
> either VB or MS Access development (or anything else...) with Postgresql.
>
> Although I haven't had a lot of problems with the driver in the past (I'm
> doing mostly everything in PLPGSQL), I always had the idea that the driver
> was good client side, but not rock-solid enough for the server side. I
> guess
> this should be wrong in a near future, thanks to you.
>
> Thanks again to you, and Mery Christmas to all,
>
> Philippe Lang
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ludek Finstrle | 2005-12-20 19:45:29 | Re: Next development steps? |
Previous Message | Philippe Lang | 2005-12-20 16:23:49 | Thanks Ludek! |