Re: Limit on number of users in postgresql?

From: "John D(dot) Burger" <john(at)mitre(dot)org>
To: "pgsql-general postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Limit on number of users in postgresql?
Date: 2007-01-30 02:21:00
Message-ID: 049BFD34-590E-4078-928B-AA83954170FE@mitre.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:

> Since the tables you need to touch are all shared, it's conceivable
> that
> this could be hacked around, but it seems awfully messy. Another
> consideration is that this'd significantly increase the amount of work
> done before validating that the connection request is authorized,

Yah, I thought the chicken-and-egg issue might be the nub of it - it
sure feels more secure to avoid accessing any tables at all 'til you
know what kind of access the user has.

- John Burger
MITRE

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-30 02:39:18 Re: programming 'like' operator
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2007-01-30 02:04:17 Re: PG Email Client