Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: progress update, some questions

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Alexey Borzov" <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: progress update, some questions
Date: 2004-04-21 12:53:13
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su] 
> Sent: 21 April 2004 13:34
> To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [pgsql-www] progress update, some questions
> Greetings.
> I almost finished the work on user-level form submits 
> (surveys, bugs, doc comments, events and news) and have a few 
> questions.
> 1) Is 'active' field in 'events' table really needed? Maybe 
> just consider the events with end date in the future as valid?

No, that field is now obsolete.

> 2) Bug submit through the website just increments some 
> sequence but the bug itself is not stored in the database. Is 
> this the expected behaviour? What came out of a lengthy 
> discussion about a "real" bug tracker?

Yes, that is the intended behaviour for the moment.

> 3) There is *no* moderation at all for the doc comments, I 
> suppose? You know why PHP's have such a good signal-to-noise 
> ratio? Here is the
> reason:

There is no moderation, though I believe some of the docs guys go
through them before any releases to incorporate anything useful. 

Feel free to add some moderation if you like - an email to the list with
a link to an 'approve' script in /admin would do the job I guess.

Regards Dave.


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Justin CliftDate: 2004-04-21 17:07:20
Subject: [Fwd: Server Upgrade: Neptune - Saturday, April 24th]
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-04-21 12:44:24
Subject: Re: banner abominations

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group