Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,"PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:
Date: 2004-01-16 21:56:10
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com] 
> Sent: 16 January 2004 21:40
> To: Dave Page; PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www]
> Justin's and my problem with Plone was that is was 
> intolerably slow on updates and administrative interfaces; 
> some of the admin screens took over a minute 
> just to load.   And this was with just him, me & Elein on it.

The only really noticable speed issues I saw whilst playing were local
network issues. I editted one page and it certainly wasn't noticably
slower than our other php admin interface.

> Also, the plone "look" says "Plone" not "PostgreSQL".   
> However, if it gets 
> something up and running in a hurry, I can certainly live with that.
> If we've got it performing better now, it's worth a 2nd look.

I think so. It looks nice, and seems quite usable and maintainable. Like
I said, the only real issues I noticed were the lack of access controls
(users should not be able to modify config nor (imho) content) and the
seemingly useless calendar (is that some kind of 'see this folder how it
was on xx-xx-xxxx' control?)

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-01-16 21:59:22
Subject: Re: [press] UltraSQL for Windows released
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 2004-01-16 21:43:50
Subject: Re: [press] UltraSQL for Windows released

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group