Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: RFC: PostgreSQL and MySQL comparison.

From: "Jeff Eckermann" <jeckermann(at)verio(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: PostgreSQL and MySQL comparison.
Date: 2001-08-29 21:24:01
Message-ID: 027d01c130d0$ee324fd0$279c10ac@INTERNAL (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
I think the quotes from Jan Wieck may be hard to understand, or even
misleading, to a reader who did not see them in the context of the
discussion in which they were written.  They contain plenty of irony
(sarcasm?), which when read literally, means something quite different from
what was intended.  Since the points made are valuable, perhaps they could
be restated in the body of the text instead?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sam Tregar" <sam(at)tregar(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] RFC: PostgreSQL and MySQL comparison.

> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Okay, I answered them:
> >
> >
> Perhaps you should add some links to PostgreSQL's full-text searching
> solutions?  It's hard to evaluate without some reference to what you're
> talking about.
> -sam
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Guy FraserDate: 2001-08-29 21:30:29
Subject: MySQL treads belong else where.
Previous:From: David FordDate: 2001-08-29 21:23:37
Subject: Re: MySQL's (false?) claims...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group