Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes

From: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Date: 2017-12-04 15:35:31
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 30.11.2017 05:02, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 15 September 2017 at 16:34, Konstantin Knizhnik
>> <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>>> Attached please find yet another version of the patch.
>> Thanks. I'm reviewing it.
> Two months later, this patch is still waiting for a review (you are
> listed as well as a reviewer of this patch). The documentation of the
> patch has conflicts, please provide a rebased version. I am moving
> this patch to next CF with waiting on author as status.
Attached please find new patch with resolved documentation conflict.

Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional:
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
projection-autotune4.patch text/x-patch 30.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2017-12-04 15:42:41 Re: [HACKERS] proposal: psql command \graw
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2017-12-04 15:31:20 Re: [HACKERS] pgbench more operators & functions