Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

AW: [HACKERS] Reference Guide (binary cursor)

From: Zeugswetter Andreas <andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>
To: "docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: AW: [HACKERS] Reference Guide (binary cursor)
Date: 1998-03-27 10:02:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>      My question is: 
>            I can't see any difference between BINARY and normal cursors.
>            Does it works ? 
>                                                            Thanks, Jose'

Yes, this works. The difference is, that for a binary cursor, the column values are not
passed through the type output function. You therefore get the internal representation for a type.
The internal representation is Platform specific, so pay attention when you use a binary cursor
on client x running on hardware y from vendor z accessing a server on hardware a from vendor b. 
e.g. for an integer column, you get a C integer number using a binary cursor, whilst you get a 
string value like '12345' using the non binary cursor.


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Ulrich VossDate: 1998-03-27 10:34:15
Subject: Reminder: Indices are not used
Previous:From: Michael MeskesDate: 1998-03-27 08:34:05
Subject: Another parsing problem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group