Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8 for Win32 -- installation problem

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <saito(at)inetrt(dot)skcapi(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,"Randolf Richardson" <rr(at)8x(dot)ca>, <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8 for Win32 -- installation problem
Date: 2005-01-10 16:20:35
Message-ID: 014901c4f730$50b7f320$1f324d80@w2k (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-ports
Dear All.

Thank you for the various information.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>

> I don't think so, but it's probably a good idea to include a readme.txt
> file in the next ZIP file that states that it's the japanese version,
> and should only be used on japanese systems.

I mention README.txt which will be read first, and so I will try to explain 
it in english and Japanese.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>

> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Perhaps also the filename should be "-jp" not "-ja"?  I agree with
> > the complainant that the former is more standard.
> ja = Japanese (ISO 639 language code)
> jp = Japan (ISO 3166 country code)
> Since the installation pack is probably targeted at users speaking 
> Japanese, much like the "en" installer targets users speaking English, 
> "ja" seems to be correct.

I like the language specification, too.

best regards,
Hiroshi Saito

In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Jani AverbachDate: 2005-01-13 18:21:59
Subject: Build report: Gentoo Linux, amd64/SMP
Previous:From: Mark RaeDate: 2005-01-10 12:26:49
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 4

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-01-10 16:37:30
Subject: Re: "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-01-10 16:20:17
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group