Re: Re: [PATCHES] Makefile.PL for Pg.so

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] Makefile.PL for Pg.so
Date: 2001-08-26 05:05:09
Message-ID: 01082601050901.01667@lowen.wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Saturday 25 August 2001 19:18, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> AFAICT, Pg.so does get the runpath set correctly. Are you saying it
> doesn't work on your system or do you want to get rid of the
> recompilation during installation?

Pg.so does not get the proper RPATH in a DESTDIR build environment.

Trying to fix this for the RPMS -- the RPATH contains the buildroot instead
of where the libs really are. Could cause security problems. Working on it,
but it's slow going for me at this busy time.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-26 05:49:38 Re: version 1 C-Language Functions documentation and ex ample
Previous Message Gowey, Geoffrey 2001-08-26 03:05:56 RE: version 1 C-Language Functions documentation and ex ample

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2001-08-26 07:58:50 Re: [BUGS] Bug #428: Another security issue with the JDBC driver.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-26 01:06:25 Re: Bug #428: Another security issue with the JDBC driver.