Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...

From: "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>
To:
Cc: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
Date: 2001-01-18 15:43:22
Message-ID: 00fd01c08165$8369c180$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Who actually types their email addresses? Use an address book. ;)

psql-odbc should be fine though.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...

>
> okay, so far, its all been positive feedback on this, so I'm going to go
> ahead with it ... with one slight change ...
>
> when we did the php list, I did it as:
>
> pgsql-php(at)postgresql(dot)org -and- comp.databases.postgresql.interfaces.php
>
> that way, for email purposes, the address was shorter, less to type in ...
>
> I'd like to do the same with the jdbc and odbc lists, unless anyone has an
> objection to typing 11 characters less in an email address? :)
>
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Adam Lang wrote:
>
> > I agree also... I don't do C programming, so a huge chunk of the list
info I
> > scan and delete. Sounds logical.
> >
> > Adam Lang
> > Systems Engineer
> > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Oscar Serrano" <oserra(at)fondos(dot)net>
> > To: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 4:02 AM
> > Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Mensaje original-----
> > > > De: pgsql-interfaces-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > > > [mailto:pgsql-interfaces-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]En nombre de Dave Page
> > > > Enviado el: jueves, 18 de enero de 2001 9:06
> > > > Para: 'The Hermit Hacker'; pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > > > Asunto: RE: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list
...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: The Hermit Hacker [mailto:scrappy(at)hub(dot)org]
> > > > > Sent: 18 January 2001 03:26
> > > > > To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > > > > Subject: [INTERFACES] [RFC] Proposed split of -interfaces list ...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > After some discussions with various members of the project, it was
> > > > > suggested that an RFC be sent out to the -interfaces list asking
for
> > > > > opinions ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Due to the growing volume on these lists, primarily around
> > > > > the ODBC and
> > > > > JDBC drivers, I'm proposing that a split to this list be
> > > > > made, so that we
> > > > > have:
> > >
> > >
> > > I completly agree. I'm not interested in JDBC nor ODBC.
> > > thank you.
> > >
> > > Oscar Serrano.
> >
> >
>
> Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick:
Scrappy
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary:
scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Brozefsky 2001-01-18 16:01:37 Re: issues with libpg interface
Previous Message Peter T Mount 2001-01-18 15:23:07 Re: Number of rows in a ResultSet ?