Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] initdb

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Postgresql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"pgsql-hackers-win32" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb
Date: 2003-10-04 23:15:15
Message-ID: 009d01c38acd$5eff8a40$6401a8c0@DUNSLANE (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-patches
Excellent idea.

Here's the URL:



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>

> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > I now have a C implementation of initdb, ...
> > There's a little work still to go (see below), but I'd appreciate some 
> > eyeballs on it to see if I have made any major booboos, or could have 
> > done things better. What's the best way to proceed?
> Put it on a web page and post the link, or if you don't have a website,
> send it to pgsql-patches (clearly marked as "not ready to apply").

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2003-10-04 23:33:46
Subject: Re: count(*) slow on large tables
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-10-04 23:01:35
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-10-05 02:49:24
Subject: Re: fix log_min_duration_statement logic error
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-10-04 22:51:08
Subject: Re: more spanish updates

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-10-06 16:01:38
Subject: signals on windows
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-10-04 19:58:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group