----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>; "PostgreSQL-patches"
<pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>; "PostgreSQL Win32 port list"
<pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] MinGW patch
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > Why does configure need to see those files? Surely you don't need
> > > configure to test the capabilities of our own source tree?
> >
> > Looking at the contents of src/include/port/win32, I would imagine the
> > problem is configure will decide we don't HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H, etc.
>
> Yep. Can anyone suggest a better solution?
>
I am seeing problem with HAVE_RL_FILENAME_COMPLETION_FUNCTION also on my
system. When I manually remove it from pg_config.h, psql compiles OK.
Regards !