> I believe that it is appropriate for contrib/ because it is a good demo
> of FTI-like capabilities. But nothing more, yet. For at least a couple
> of reasons:
> 1) It generates the "index" as a table, not a PostgreSQL index or
> index-like thing.
> 2) It has a hardcoded list of non-indexed words. This should come from a
> table, to allow it to be tuned to the application requirements.
> - Thomas
a) Considering that I was coding up the same thing with triggers and such,
things could only get better.
b) Check out MSSQL 7's capabilities and weep.
c) It would be a start. One its in the tree, it gets used more, gets
It would be a while yet before 7.2 starts, plenty of time then to develop
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: xuyifeng||Date: 2000-11-28 08:17:21|
|Subject: beta testing version|
|Previous:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 2000-11-28 08:06:49|
|Subject: Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice|