| From: | "john huttley" <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Full text Indexing -out of contrib and into main.. |
| Date: | 2000-11-28 08:09:38 |
| Message-ID: | 008701c05912$8daa3740$ca5fa8c0@hisdad.org.nz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I believe that it is appropriate for contrib/ because it is a good demo
> of FTI-like capabilities. But nothing more, yet. For at least a couple
> of reasons:
>
> 1) It generates the "index" as a table, not a PostgreSQL index or
> index-like thing.
>
> 2) It has a hardcoded list of non-indexed words. This should come from a
> table, to allow it to be tuned to the application requirements.
>
> Comments?
>
> - Thomas
>
In general..
a) Considering that I was coding up the same thing with triggers and such,
things could only get better.
b) Check out MSSQL 7's capabilities and weep.
c) It would be a start. One its in the tree, it gets used more, gets
improved..
It would be a while yet before 7.2 starts, plenty of time then to develop
it further.
Regards
John
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | xuyifeng | 2000-11-28 08:17:21 | beta testing version |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-11-28 08:06:49 | Re: Re: FWD: tinterval vs interval on pgsql-novice |