From: | "Iain" <iain(at)mst(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Michael Ryan S(dot) Puncia" <mpuncia(at)census(dot)gov(dot)ph>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM |
Date: | 2005-02-15 01:52:01 |
Message-ID: | 007f01c51300$f44334a0$7201a8c0@mst1x5r347kymb |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi,
just make sure that your freespace map is big enough and then do a vacuum
analyse without the full option.
I can imagine that database performance might not be as good as it would be
after a vacuum full, though I expect that it wouldn't make much difference.
regards
Iain
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Ryan S. Puncia
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 10:34 AM
Subject: [PERFORM] VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM
Hi,
I have 3 tables in the database with 80G of data, one of them is almost
40G and the remaining 2 tables has 20G each.
We use this database mainly for query and updating is done only quarterly
and the database perform well. My problem
is after updating and then run VACCUM FULL ANALYZE vacuuming the tables
takes days to complete. I hope someone
can help me solve my problem.
Thanks
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Ryan S. Puncia | 2005-02-15 02:10:30 | Re: VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM |
Previous Message | Michael Ryan S. Puncia | 2005-02-15 01:34:39 | VACCUM FULL ANALYZE PROBLEM |