Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: looking for a secure

From: "Mitch Vincent" <mvincent(at)cablespeed(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Fran Fabrizio" <ffabrizio(at)mmrd(dot)com>
Subject: Re: looking for a secure
Date: 2001-07-31 17:00:01
Message-ID: 006b01c119e2$3e7bab40$1251000a@Mitch (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
I think you've got most of your problem solved -- at least in theory.

The answer to your questions of SSL and IPs is yes, and yes - check the
manual for details..

10,000 clients eh'. I hope you have some beefy hardware :-)

> Scenario 3 seems the most elegant to me.  It avoids having to set up
> some sort of replication/copying scheme and having the same data stored
> in two different places.  But we are understandably nervous about
> hanging that main db out there on the internet.  So, I'm looking for the
> best recipe to minimize risk.  Here's what I've thought about so far:

In response to


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Paul RamseyDate: 2001-07-31 17:08:27
Subject: Re: looking for a secure
Previous:From: Fran FabrizioDate: 2001-07-31 16:50:31
Subject: looking for a secure

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group