Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Adding JDK1.5 removing 1.1 support.

From: "Chris Smith" <cdsmith(at)twu(dot)net>
To: "Oliver Jowett" <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>,"Kris Jurka" <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding JDK1.5 removing 1.1 support.
Date: 2004-07-16 13:40:21
Message-ID: 005301c46b3a$718a9800$6f00000a@KYA (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Oliver Jowett wrote:
> I'm actually tempted to drop the pooling DataSource implementations
> altogther. Does anyone on the list actually use these? I think the
> more common approach is for a higher layer to use our
> ConnectionPoolDataSource implementation (or plain DataSource, even)
> plus their own pooling logic..

I certainly do use Jdbc3PoolingDataSource, and would hate to see it go away.

The Easiest Way to Train Anyone... Anywhere.

Chris Smith - Lead Software Developer/Technical Trainer
MindIQ Corporation

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: José Carlos StevensonDate: 2004-07-16 15:10:16
Subject: Re: SSL Problem
Previous:From: Aaron MulderDate: 2004-07-16 12:50:59
Subject: Re: Adding JDK1.5 removing 1.1 support.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group