| From: | Eric Lu <yclu(at)ecompliance(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | referential constraint bug |
| Date: | 2002-03-07 00:49:34 |
| Message-ID: | 002b01c1c572$05ebd610$0c28a8c0@ecompliance.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
To whom it may concern:
I found a constraint bug on PostgreSQL lastest version (7.2).
Here is how I got the bug.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
testdb=>
testdb=> create table mytest(
testdb-> id int primary key,
testdb-> masterid int constraint fk_mytest_constr1 REFERENCES mytest(id) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE NO ACTION DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
testdb-> );
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'mytest_pkey' for table 'mytest'
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit trigger(s) for FOREIGN KEY check(s)
CREATE
testdb=> begin;
BEGIN
testdb=> insert into mytest(id,masterid) values(1,null);
INSERT 447153 1
testdb=> insert into mytest(id,masterid) values(2,5);
INSERT 447154 1
testdb=> insert into mytest(id,masterid) values(3,2);
INSERT 447155 1
testdb=> update mytest set masterid=1 where id=2;
UPDATE 1
testdb=> end;
ERROR: fk_mytest_constr1 referential integrity violation - key referenced from mytest not found in mytest
testdb=>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric
PS. 1.There won't be such an error if I do another insert statement which doesn't violate the reference constraint
before ending the transaction.(eg.insert into mytest(id,masterid) values(4,3);)
2.It happens while I was using ver7.1.3 and I do an upgrade and run the regression test(everything is fine).
3.It's on a pentium 75(run as 120MHZ) with 40MB RAM, Redhat 6.1
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurent FAILLIE | 2002-03-07 10:47:08 | Re: Bug #608: cache lookup failed |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-03-06 18:35:49 | Re: Bug #608: cache lookup failed |