Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Triggers, Stored Procedures, PHP. was: Re: PostgreSQL

From: "Rick Gigger" <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com>
To: <listas(at)lozano(dot)eti(dot)br>, "Doug McNaught" <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,"Randolf Richardson" <rr(at)8x(dot)ca>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Triggers, Stored Procedures, PHP. was: Re: PostgreSQL
Date: 2004-01-30 21:36:28
Message-ID: 002001c3e779$1fc689b0$0700a8c0@trogdor (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
> > I can't imagine how a web server cannot be affected by apps creating
> > threads and/or proccesses. Think about memmory use, resource
> > pooling, syncronization issues, ... remember a child process ot
> > thread prevents the termination of its parent (which may become a
> > zombie on Unix systems, and a zombie still holds its open file
> > handles).
> This is wrong.  Parents *can* terminate with running children, and
> zombie processes take up no resources other than a process table slot.

In addition I don't think that if thread A spawns thread B that thread A has
to wait until thread B terminates before it can itself terminate.  Why would
this be the case?  Threads to not necessarily have the same parent child
relationships that processes do.

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Gregory S. WilliamsonDate: 2004-01-30 21:46:33
Subject: Re: IDENT and pg_hda.conf
Previous:From: Ed L.Date: 2004-01-30 21:33:51
Subject: DB cache size strategies

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group