| From: | "Vadim Mikheev" <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Adam Haberlach" <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com>, "Don Baccus" <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Thomas Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: beta testing version |
| Date: | 2000-12-03 20:09:05 |
| Message-ID: | 001f01c05d64$e3c19000$bc7a30d0@sectorbase.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> >I totaly missed your point here. How closing source of ERserver is related
> >to closing code of PostgreSQL DB server? Let me clear things:
>
> (not based on WAL)
>
> That's wasn't clear from the blurb.
>
> Still, this notion that PG, Inc will start producing closed-source products
> poisons the well. It strengthens FUD arguments of the "open source can't
> provide enterprise solutions" variety. "Look, even PostgreSQL, Inc realizes
> that you must follow a close sourced model
> in order to provide tools for the corporate world."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Did you miss Thomas' answer? Wasn't it clear that the order is to provide
income?
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gary MacDougall | 2000-12-03 20:29:47 | Re: beta testing version |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-03 17:10:02 | Re: COPY BINARY is broken... |