Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: beta testing version

From: "Vadim Mikheev" <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com>
To: "Adam Haberlach" <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com>, "Don Baccus" <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: "Thomas Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: beta testing version
Date: 2000-12-03 20:09:05
Message-ID: 001f01c05d64$e3c19000$ (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> >I totaly missed your point here. How closing source of ERserver is related
> >to closing code of PostgreSQL DB server? Let me clear things:
> (not based on WAL)
> That's wasn't clear from the blurb.
> Still, this notion that PG, Inc will start producing closed-source products
> poisons the well.  It strengthens FUD arguments of the "open source can't
> provide enterprise solutions" variety.  "Look, even PostgreSQL, Inc realizes
> that you must follow a close sourced model
> in order to provide tools for the corporate world."

Did you miss Thomas' answer? Wasn't it clear that the order is to provide


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gary MacDougallDate: 2000-12-03 20:29:47
Subject: Re: beta testing version
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-03 17:10:02
Subject: Re: COPY BINARY is broken...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group