From: | "Rodrigo Sakai" <rodrigo(dot)sakai(at)poli(dot)usp(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Jeremy Drake'" <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'PostgreSQL Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ERROR: index row size |
Date: | 2007-06-04 04:34:34 |
Message-ID: | 001801c7a661$a70994d0$6500a8c0@NOTEBOOKSAKAI |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>Indeed ... *please* tell us your compiler issued a warning about that.
I did shell scripts that suppress the warnings, so it was a big mistake, I
agree! But I think my problem is not here!
> Well, you oughta allocate result before you store into it, not after,
> and I bet you meant to assign to the tvi and tvf fields, not tvi twice.
You are right again. But this happened because I copy and paste the example
with a different order. But in my code all this is ok!
>Bad as these mistakes are, they don't directly explain why a later index
>entry creation would fail. What I'm betting is that your CREATE TYPE
>command does not correctly describe the datatype size. Based on this
>code it should be pass-by-reference, fixed-size-8-bytes, but I'll bet
>a nickel your CREATE TYPE says something else --- probably varlena.
Humm, this can help! I will investigate! Thanks a lot!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-06-04 07:30:07 | So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now? |
Previous Message | Rodrigo Sakai | 2007-06-04 03:59:18 | Re: ERROR: index row size |