From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Interesting mention of PostgreSQL in news |
Date: | 2000-06-23 01:34:21 |
Message-ID: | 00062221402001.00923@lorc.wgcr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The interesting part of this for me was:
> Very soon, important applications such as Apache, Samba, PostgreSQL,
> linuxconf, Sendmail, bind, Emacs, SSL, and SSH were up and running.
> There are now over 400 packages, both source and binaries, ready for use
> on Linux for S/390.
> Guess we are an important application now. :-)
You just now figuring that out, Bruce? :-) No, that was the part I thought
most interesting -- PostgreSQL being considered not just an important
application, but an important application running on a linux-powered mainframe
-- or am I the only one who gets the non-sequitur here? On a machine that runs
VM/ESA and more than likely DB2, CICS, etc, PostgreSQL is an important
application. On a mainframe. An IBM mainframe.
We are mentioned in the same sentence and with the same implications as Apache,
Sendmail, Bind, and Samba -- now that's classy.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-06-23 01:52:49 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-06-23 00:35:50 | PGSQL internals question... |