Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch for better large objects support

From: Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support
Date: 2000-06-12 18:13:42
Message-ID: 00061301151806.07937@dyp (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
> > > Will anybody want to use this when TOAST comes to be?
> > 
> > 1. There's no any TOAST at the moment.
> > 2. For really large objects TOAST will be really inefficient for quite small < 64K other
> > way around.
> This stuff is going into 7.1, and TOAST will be there.  Also TOAST will
> not be inefficient for small objects.

Sorry. Maybe my english is a little bit dumb. I said that TOAST will be inefficient
for really large objects. And for small objects it will be much more efficient.

BTW, when 7.1 is planned?

Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine

E-Mail: dyp(at)perchine(dot)com
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-06-12 19:46:57
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support
Previous:From: Denis PerchineDate: 2000-06-12 18:11:39
Subject: Re: Caching number of blocks in relation to avoi lseek.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group