| From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: Index tuple count != heap tuple count problem identified |
| Date: | 2000-04-06 01:17:45 |
| Message-ID: | 000401bf9f65$ea1c4de0$2801007e@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)hub(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)hub(dot)org]On
> Behalf Of Tom Lane
>
> You'll probably recall reports of messages like this out of VACUUM:
> NOTICE: Index ind1: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (2002) IS NOT THE
> SAME AS HEAP' (3003).
> I've figured out the cause (or at least a cause) of this condition.
>
> The CREATE INDEX operation has only bothered to index the non-dead
> tuples. So, VACUUM's little sanity check fails.
>
Is it wrong to change the implementation of CREATE INDEX ?
I have a fix.
It needs the change of duplicate check(tuplesort->btbuild) and
I've thougth that it would be better to change it after the release
of 7.0.
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-04-06 01:24:26 | Re: Index tuple count != heap tuple count problem identified] |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-04-06 00:51:04 | Re: Index tuple count != heap tuple count problem identified |