Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #2458: Postgresql crash

From: "Cstdenis" <cstdenis(at)ctgameinfo(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2458: Postgresql crash
Date: 2006-05-27 03:26:06
Message-ID: 000101c6817a$8456ebc0$6401a8c0@chris (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
My application does not use any transactions (other than the implicit per
statement ones that must exist), but I think I did edit some functions in
pgadmin around that time so it may be that bug or something similar/related.

I didn't bother to upgrade to 8.1.4 because I thought it was just a security
fix that didn't apply to me. I'll upgrade tonight during off hours.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Cstdenis" <cstdenis(at)fanart-central(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2458: Postgresql crash

> "Cstdenis" <cstdenis(at)fanart-central(dot)net> writes:
> > [ SIGSEGV in plpgsql_xact_cb ]
> I think this is probably an instance of the bug patched here:
> If you're certain that your applications never redefine a plpgsql
> function that might be in active use, then we might need to look
> harder.  Otherwise, please update to 8.1.4 and see if the problem
> recurs ...
> regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Volkan YAZICIDate: 2006-05-27 08:03:45
Subject: Strange random() Correlation
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-05-27 03:05:52
Subject: Re: BUG #2458: Postgresql crash

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group