RE: [HACKERS][PATCH] Applying PMDK to WAL operations for persistent memory

From: "Takashi Menjo" <menjo(dot)takashi(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "'Heikki Linnakangas'" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "'Andres Freund'" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "'Michael Paquier'" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "'Dmitry Dolgov'" <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, <ishizaki(dot)teruaki(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, <ichiyanagi(dot)yoshimi(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS][PATCH] Applying PMDK to WAL operations for persistent memory
Date: 2019-01-30 06:16:12
Message-ID: 000001d4b863$4c9e8fc0$e5dbaf40$
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Sorry but I found that the patchset v2 had a bug in managing WAL segment
file offset. I fixed it and updated a patchset as v3 (attached).


Takashi Menjo - NTT Software Innovation Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Add-configure-option-for-PMDK-v3.patch application/octet-stream 5.0 KB
0002-Read-write-WAL-files-using-PMDK-v3.patch application/octet-stream 47.4 KB
0003-Walreceiver-WAL-IO-using-PMDK-v3.patch application/octet-stream 4.8 KB


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pratheej Chandrika 2019-01-30 06:28:04 Question on compatibility of Postgres with Open JDK
Previous Message Surafel Temesgen 2019-01-30 06:07:40 Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option