| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Arithmetic operators for macaddr type |
| Date: | 2012-01-17 05:38:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFoppCsM6zOs9gHcWiFvLUvbqKGm7ek9PX_Nd-i13E86g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12 December 2011 15:59, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> 2011/12/12 Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>> I just bumped into a situation where I wanted to do a little macaddr
>>> arithmetic in postgres. I note that the inet type has support for
>>> bitwise AND, OR and NOT, as well as subtraction, but macaddr has none
>>> of the above.
>>
>> +1
>>
>
> Here is a patch for $SUBJECT. I merely added support for ~, & and |
> operators for the macaddr type. The patch itself is rather trivial,
> and includes regression tests and a doc update.
The patch looks fine except that it uses the OIDs already used in pg_proc.h.
Attached is the updated version of the patch, which fixes the above problem.
> For the documentation, I did think about adding a new table for the
> macaddr operators, but in the end decided it would probably be an
> overkill.
Agreed.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| macaddr-bitwise-ops_v2.diff | text/x-diff | 6.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-01-17 06:21:28 | Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-01-17 05:33:22 | Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport? |