A table expression computes a table.
The table expression contains a FROM
clause that is optionally followed by WHERE, GROUP BY, and
HAVING clauses. Trivial table
expressions simply refer to a table on disk, a so-called base
table, but more complex expressions can be used to modify or
combine base tables in various ways.
The optional WHERE, GROUP BY, and HAVING
clauses in the table expression specify a pipeline of successive
transformations performed on the table derived in the FROM clause. All these transformations produce a
virtual table that provides the rows that are passed to the select
list to compute the output rows of the query.
FROM
ClauseThe FROM Clause derives
a table from one or more other tables given in a comma-separated
table reference list.
FROMtable_reference[,table_reference[, ...]]
A table reference can be a table name (possibly
schema-qualified), or a derived table such as a subquery, a
JOIN construct, or complex
combinations of these. If more than one table reference is listed
in the FROM clause, the tables are
cross-joined (that is, the Cartesian product of their rows is
formed; see below). The result of the FROM list is an intermediate virtual table that
can then be subject to transformations by the WHERE, GROUP BY, and
HAVING clauses and is finally the
result of the overall table expression.
When a table reference names a table that is the parent of a
table inheritance hierarchy, the table reference produces rows of
not only that table but all of its descendant tables, unless the
key word ONLY precedes the table name.
However, the reference produces only the columns that appear in the
named table — any columns added in subtables are ignored.
Instead of writing ONLY before the
table name, you can write * after the
table name to explicitly specify that descendant tables are
included. There is no real reason to use this syntax any more,
because searching descendant tables is now always the default
behavior. However, it is supported for compatibility with older
releases.
A joined table is a table derived from two other (real or derived) tables according to the rules of the particular join type. Inner, outer, and cross-joins are available. The general syntax of a joined table is
T1join_typeT2[join_condition]
Joins of all types can be chained together, or nested: either or
both T1 and T2 can be joined tables.
Parentheses can be used around JOIN
clauses to control the join order. In the absence of parentheses,
JOIN clauses nest left-to-right.
Join Types
T1CROSS JOINT2
For every possible combination of rows from T1 and T2 (i.e., a Cartesian product), the
joined table will contain a row consisting of all columns in
T1 followed by all
columns in T2. If the
tables have N and M rows respectively, the joined table will have N
* M rows.
FROM is equivalent to
T1 CROSS JOIN T2FROM (see below). It
is also equivalent to T1 INNER JOIN T2 ON TRUEFROM .T1, T2
This latter equivalence does not hold exactly when more than two
tables appear, because JOIN binds more
tightly than comma. For example FROM
is not the same as
T1 CROSS JOIN T2 INNER JOIN T3 ON conditionFROM because the
T1, T2 INNER JOIN T3 ON conditioncondition can reference
T1 in the first case but
not the second.
T1{ [INNER] | { LEFT | RIGHT | FULL } [OUTER] } JOINT2ONboolean_expressionT1{ [INNER] | { LEFT | RIGHT | FULL } [OUTER] } JOINT2USING (join column list)T1NATURAL { [INNER] | { LEFT | RIGHT | FULL } [OUTER] } JOINT2
The words INNER and OUTER are optional in all forms. INNER is the default; LEFT, RIGHT, and
FULL imply an outer join.
The join condition is specified in
the ON or USING clause, or implicitly by the word
NATURAL. The join condition determines
which rows from the two source tables are considered to
“match”, as
explained in detail below.
The possible types of qualified join are:
INNER
JOINFor each row R1 of T1, the joined table has a row for each row in T2 that satisfies the join condition with R1.
LEFT OUTER JOIN
First, an inner join is performed. Then, for each row in T1 that does not satisfy the join condition with any row in T2, a joined row is added with null values in columns of T2. Thus, the joined table always has at least one row for each row in T1.
RIGHT OUTER
JOIN First, an inner join is performed. Then, for each row in T2 that does not satisfy the join condition with any row in T1, a joined row is added with null values in columns of T1. This is the converse of a left join: the result table will always have a row for each row in T2.
FULL OUTER
JOINFirst, an inner join is performed. Then, for each row in T1 that does not satisfy the join condition with any row in T2, a joined row is added with null values in columns of T2. Also, for each row of T2 that does not satisfy the join condition with any row in T1, a joined row with null values in the columns of T1 is added.
The ON clause is the most general
kind of join condition: it takes a Boolean value expression of the
same kind as is used in a WHERE
clause. A pair of rows from T1 and T2 match if the ON expression evaluates to true.
The USING clause is a shorthand
that allows you to take advantage of the specific situation where
both sides of the join use the same name for the joining column(s).
It takes a comma-separated list of the shared column names and
forms a join condition that includes an equality comparison for
each one. For example, joining T1 and T2 with USING
(a, b) produces the join condition ON
.T1.a = T2.a AND T1.b = T2.b
Furthermore, the output of JOIN
USING suppresses redundant columns: there is no need to
print both of the matched columns, since they must have equal
values. While JOIN ON produces all
columns from T1 followed
by all columns from T2,
JOIN USING produces one output column
for each of the listed column pairs (in the listed order), followed
by any remaining columns from T1, followed by any remaining
columns from T2.
Finally,
NATURAL is a shorthand form of
USING: it forms a USING list consisting of all column names that
appear in both input tables. As with USING, these columns appear only once in the
output table. If there are no common column names, NATURAL JOIN behaves like JOIN ... ON TRUE, producing a cross-product
join.
USING is reasonably safe from
column changes in the joined relations since only the listed
columns are combined. NATURAL is
considerably more risky since any schema changes to either relation
that cause a new matching column name to be present will cause the
join to combine that new column as well.
To put this together, assume we have tables t1:
num | name -----+------ 1 | a 2 | b 3 | c
and t2:
num | value -----+------- 1 | xxx 3 | yyy 5 | zzz
then we get the following results for the various joins:
=>SELECT * FROM t1 CROSS JOIN t2;num | name | num | value -----+------+-----+------- 1 | a | 1 | xxx 1 | a | 3 | yyy 1 | a | 5 | zzz 2 | b | 1 | xxx 2 | b | 3 | yyy 2 | b | 5 | zzz 3 | c | 1 | xxx 3 | c | 3 | yyy 3 | c | 5 | zzz (9 rows)=>SELECT * FROM t1 INNER JOIN t2 ON t1.num = t2.num;num | name | num | value -----+------+-----+------- 1 | a | 1 | xxx 3 | c | 3 | yyy (2 rows)=>SELECT * FROM t1 INNER JOIN t2 USING (num);num | name | value -----+------+------- 1 | a | xxx 3 | c | yyy (2 rows)=>SELECT * FROM t1 NATURAL INNER JOIN t2;num | name | value -----+------+------- 1 | a | xxx 3 | c | yyy (2 rows)=>SELECT * FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 ON t1.num = t2.num;num | name | num | value -----+------+-----+------- 1 | a | 1 | xxx 2 | b | | 3 | c | 3 | yyy (3 rows)=>SELECT * FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 USING (num);num | name | value -----+------+------- 1 | a | xxx 2 | b | 3 | c | yyy (3 rows)=>SELECT * FROM t1 RIGHT JOIN t2 ON t1.num = t2.num;num | name | num | value -----+------+-----+------- 1 | a | 1 | xxx 3 | c | 3 | yyy | | 5 | zzz (3 rows)=>SELECT * FROM t1 FULL JOIN t2 ON t1.num = t2.num;num | name | num | value -----+------+-----+------- 1 | a | 1 | xxx 2 | b | | 3 | c | 3 | yyy | | 5 | zzz (4 rows)
The join condition specified with ON can also contain conditions that do not relate
directly to the join. This can prove useful for some queries but
needs to be thought out carefully. For example:
=>SELECT * FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 ON t1.num = t2.num AND t2.value = 'xxx';num | name | num | value -----+------+-----+------- 1 | a | 1 | xxx 2 | b | | 3 | c | | (3 rows)
Notice that placing the restriction in the WHERE clause produces a different result:
=>SELECT * FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 ON t1.num = t2.num WHERE t2.value = 'xxx';num | name | num | value -----+------+-----+------- 1 | a | 1 | xxx (1 row)
This is because a restriction placed in the ON clause is processed before the join, while a restriction
placed in the WHERE clause is
processed after the join.
That does not matter with inner joins, but it matters a lot with
outer joins.
A temporary name can be given to tables and complex table references to be used for references to the derived table in the rest of the query. This is called a table alias.
To create a table alias, write
FROMtable_referenceASalias
or
FROMtable_referencealias
The AS key word is optional noise.
alias can be any
identifier.
A typical application of table aliases is to assign short identifiers to long table names to keep the join clauses readable. For example:
SELECT * FROM some_very_long_table_name s JOIN another_fairly_long_name a ON s.id = a.num;
The alias becomes the new name of the table reference so far as the current query is concerned — it is not allowed to refer to the table by the original name elsewhere in the query. Thus, this is not valid:
SELECT * FROM my_table AS m WHERE my_table.a > 5; -- wrong
Table aliases are mainly for notational convenience, but it is necessary to use them when joining a table to itself, e.g.:
SELECT * FROM people AS mother JOIN people AS child ON mother.id = child.mother_id;
Additionally, an alias is required if the table reference is a subquery (see Section 7.2.1.3).
Parentheses are used to resolve ambiguities. In the following
example, the first statement assigns the alias b to the second instance of my_table, but the second statement assigns the
alias to the result of the join:
SELECT * FROM my_table AS a CROSS JOIN my_table AS b ... SELECT * FROM (my_table AS a CROSS JOIN my_table) AS b ...
Another form of table aliasing gives temporary names to the columns of the table, as well as the table itself:
FROMtable_reference[AS]alias(column1[,column2[, ...]] )
If fewer column aliases are specified than the actual table has columns, the remaining columns are not renamed. This syntax is especially useful for self-joins or subqueries.
When an alias is applied to the output of a JOIN clause, the alias hides the original name(s)
within the JOIN. For example:
SELECT a.* FROM my_table AS a JOIN your_table AS b ON ...
is valid SQL, but:
SELECT a.* FROM (my_table AS a JOIN your_table AS b ON ...) AS c
is not valid; the table alias a is
not visible outside the alias c.
Subqueries specifying a derived table must be enclosed in parentheses and must be assigned a table alias name (as in Section 7.2.1.2). For example:
FROM (SELECT * FROM table1) AS alias_name
This example is equivalent to FROM table1
AS alias_name. More interesting cases, which cannot be
reduced to a plain join, arise when the subquery involves grouping
or aggregation.
A subquery can also be a VALUES
list:
FROM (VALUES ('anne', 'smith'), ('bob', 'jones'), ('joe', 'blow'))
AS names(first, last)
Again, a table alias is required. Assigning alias names to the
columns of the VALUES list is
optional, but is good practice. For more information see Section 7.7.
Table functions are functions that produce a set of rows, made
up of either base data types (scalar types) or composite data types
(table rows). They are used like a table, view, or subquery in the
FROM clause of a query. Columns
returned by table functions can be included in SELECT, JOIN, or
WHERE clauses in the same manner as
columns of a table, view, or subquery.
Table functions may also be combined using the ROWS FROM syntax, with the results returned in
parallel columns; the number of result rows in this case is that of
the largest function result, with smaller results padded with null
values to match.
function_call[WITH ORDINALITY] [[AS]table_alias[(column_alias[, ... ])]] ROWS FROM(function_call[, ... ] ) [WITH ORDINALITY] [[AS]table_alias[(column_alias[, ... ])]]
If the WITH ORDINALITY clause is
specified, an additional column of type bigint will be added to the function result columns.
This column numbers the rows of the function result set, starting
from 1. (This is a generalization of the SQL-standard syntax for
UNNEST ... WITH ORDINALITY.) By
default, the ordinal column is called ordinality, but a different column name can be
assigned to it using an AS clause.
The special table function UNNEST
may be called with any number of array parameters, and it returns a
corresponding number of columns, as if UNNEST (Section 9.18)
had been called on each parameter separately and combined using the
ROWS FROM construct.
UNNEST(array_expression[, ... ] ) [WITH ORDINALITY] [[AS]table_alias[(column_alias[, ... ])]]
If no table_alias is
specified, the function name is used as the table name; in the case
of a ROWS FROM() construct, the first
function's name is used.
If column aliases are not supplied, then for a function returning a base data type, the column name is also the same as the function name. For a function returning a composite type, the result columns get the names of the individual attributes of the type.
Some examples:
CREATE TABLE foo (fooid int, foosubid int, fooname text);
CREATE FUNCTION getfoo(int) RETURNS SETOF foo AS $$
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE fooid = $1;
$$ LANGUAGE SQL;
SELECT * FROM getfoo(1) AS t1;
SELECT * FROM foo
WHERE foosubid IN (
SELECT foosubid
FROM getfoo(foo.fooid) z
WHERE z.fooid = foo.fooid
);
CREATE VIEW vw_getfoo AS SELECT * FROM getfoo(1);
SELECT * FROM vw_getfoo;
In some cases it is useful to define table functions that can
return different column sets depending on how they are invoked. To
support this, the table function can be declared as returning the
pseudo-type record. When such a function
is used in a query, the expected row structure must be specified in
the query itself, so that the system can know how to parse and plan
the query. This syntax looks like:
function_call[AS]alias(column_definition[, ... ])function_callAS [alias] (column_definition[, ... ]) ROWS FROM( ...function_callAS (column_definition[, ... ]) [, ... ] )
When not using the ROWS FROM()
syntax, the column_definition list replaces the
column alias list that could otherwise be attached to the
FROM item; the names in the column
definitions serve as column aliases. When using the ROWS FROM() syntax, a column_definition list can be
attached to each member function separately; or if there is only
one member function and no WITH
ORDINALITY clause, a column_definition list can be
written in place of a column alias list following ROWS FROM().
Consider this example:
SELECT *
FROM dblink('dbname=mydb', 'SELECT proname, prosrc FROM pg_proc')
AS t1(proname name, prosrc text)
WHERE proname LIKE 'bytea%';
The dblink function
(part of the dblink module) executes a remote query. It
is declared to return record since it
might be used for any kind of query. The actual column set must be
specified in the calling query so that the parser knows, for
example, what * should expand to.
LATERAL SubqueriesSubqueries appearing in FROM can be
preceded by the key word LATERAL. This
allows them to reference columns provided by preceding FROM items. (Without LATERAL, each subquery is evaluated independently
and so cannot cross-reference any other FROM item.)
Table functions appearing in FROM
can also be preceded by the key word LATERAL, but for functions the key word is
optional; the function's arguments can contain references to
columns provided by preceding FROM
items in any case.
A LATERAL item can appear at top
level in the FROM list, or within a
JOIN tree. In the latter case it can
also refer to any items that are on the left-hand side of a
JOIN that it is on the right-hand side
of.
When a FROM item contains
LATERAL cross-references, evaluation
proceeds as follows: for each row of the FROM item providing the cross-referenced
column(s), or set of rows of multiple FROM items providing the columns, the LATERAL item is evaluated using that row or row
set's values of the columns. The resulting row(s) are joined as
usual with the rows they were computed from. This is repeated for
each row or set of rows from the column source table(s).
A trivial example of LATERAL is
SELECT * FROM foo, LATERAL (SELECT * FROM bar WHERE bar.id = foo.bar_id) ss;
This is not especially useful since it has exactly the same result as the more conventional
SELECT * FROM foo, bar WHERE bar.id = foo.bar_id;
LATERAL is primarily useful when
the cross-referenced column is necessary for computing the row(s)
to be joined. A common application is providing an argument value
for a set-returning function. For example, supposing that
vertices(polygon) returns the set of
vertices of a polygon, we could identify close-together vertices of
polygons stored in a table with:
SELECT p1.id, p2.id, v1, v2
FROM polygons p1, polygons p2,
LATERAL vertices(p1.poly) v1,
LATERAL vertices(p2.poly) v2
WHERE (v1 <-> v2) < 10 AND p1.id != p2.id;
This query could also be written
SELECT p1.id, p2.id, v1, v2
FROM polygons p1 CROSS JOIN LATERAL vertices(p1.poly) v1,
polygons p2 CROSS JOIN LATERAL vertices(p2.poly) v2
WHERE (v1 <-> v2) < 10 AND p1.id != p2.id;
or in several other equivalent formulations. (As already
mentioned, the LATERAL key word is
unnecessary in this example, but we use it for clarity.)
It is often particularly handy to LEFT
JOIN to a LATERAL subquery, so
that source rows will appear in the result even if the LATERAL subquery produces no rows for them. For
example, if get_product_names()
returns the names of products made by a manufacturer, but some
manufacturers in our table currently produce no products, we could
find out which ones those are like this:
SELECT m.name FROM manufacturers m LEFT JOIN LATERAL get_product_names(m.id) pname ON true WHERE pname IS NULL;
WHERE ClauseThe syntax of the WHERE Clause is
WHERE search_condition
where search_condition
is any value expression (see Section 4.2) that returns a
value of type boolean.
After the processing of the FROM
clause is done, each row of the derived virtual table is checked
against the search condition. If the result of the condition is
true, the row is kept in the output table, otherwise (i.e., if the
result is false or null) it is discarded. The search condition
typically references at least one column of the table generated in
the FROM clause; this is not required,
but otherwise the WHERE clause will be
fairly useless.
The join condition of an inner join can be written either in the
WHERE clause or in the JOIN clause. For example, these table expressions
are equivalent:
FROM a, b WHERE a.id = b.id AND b.val > 5
and:
FROM a INNER JOIN b ON (a.id = b.id) WHERE b.val > 5
or perhaps even:
FROM a NATURAL JOIN b WHERE b.val > 5
Which one of these you use is mainly a matter of style. The
JOIN syntax in the FROM clause is probably not as portable to other
SQL database management systems, even though it is in the SQL
standard. For outer joins there is no choice: they must be done in
the FROM clause. The ON or USING clause of
an outer join is not
equivalent to a WHERE condition,
because it results in the addition of rows (for unmatched input
rows) as well as the removal of rows in the final result.
Here are some examples of WHERE
clauses:
SELECT ... FROM fdt WHERE c1 > 5 SELECT ... FROM fdt WHERE c1 IN (1, 2, 3) SELECT ... FROM fdt WHERE c1 IN (SELECT c1 FROM t2) SELECT ... FROM fdt WHERE c1 IN (SELECT c3 FROM t2 WHERE c2 = fdt.c1 + 10) SELECT ... FROM fdt WHERE c1 BETWEEN (SELECT c3 FROM t2 WHERE c2 = fdt.c1 + 10) AND 100 SELECT ... FROM fdt WHERE EXISTS (SELECT c1 FROM t2 WHERE c2 > fdt.c1)
fdt is the table derived in the
FROM clause. Rows that do not meet the
search condition of the WHERE clause
are eliminated from fdt. Notice the
use of scalar subqueries as value expressions. Just like any other
query, the subqueries can employ complex table expressions. Notice
also how fdt is referenced in the
subqueries. Qualifying c1 as
fdt.c1 is only necessary if
c1 is also the name of a column in the
derived input table of the subquery. But qualifying the column name
adds clarity even when it is not needed. This example shows how the
column naming scope of an outer query extends into its inner
queries.
GROUP
BY and HAVING ClausesAfter passing the WHERE filter, the
derived input table might be subject to grouping, using the
GROUP BY clause, and elimination of
group rows using the HAVING
clause.
SELECTselect_listFROM ... [WHERE ...] GROUP BYgrouping_column_reference[,grouping_column_reference]...
The GROUP BY Clause
is used to group together those rows in a table that have the same
values in all the columns listed. The order in which the columns
are listed does not matter. The effect is to combine each set of
rows having common values into one group row that represents all
rows in the group. This is done to eliminate redundancy in the
output and/or compute aggregates that apply to these groups. For
instance:
=>SELECT * FROM test1;x | y ---+--- a | 3 c | 2 b | 5 a | 1 (4 rows)=>SELECT x FROM test1 GROUP BY x;x --- a b c (3 rows)
In the second query, we could not have written SELECT * FROM test1 GROUP BY x, because there is
no single value for the column y that
could be associated with each group. The grouped-by columns can be
referenced in the select list since they have a single value in
each group.
In general, if a table is grouped, columns that are not listed
in GROUP BY cannot be referenced
except in aggregate expressions. An example with aggregate
expressions is:
=>SELECT x, sum(y) FROM test1 GROUP BY x;x | sum ---+----- a | 4 b | 5 c | 2 (3 rows)
Here sum is an aggregate function
that computes a single value over the entire group. More
information about the available aggregate functions can be found in
Section 9.20.
Grouping without aggregate expressions effectively calculates
the set of distinct values in a column. This can also be achieved
using the DISTINCT clause (see
Section 7.3.3).
Here is another example: it calculates the total sales for each product (rather than the total sales of all products):
SELECT product_id, p.name, (sum(s.units) * p.price) AS sales
FROM products p LEFT JOIN sales s USING (product_id)
GROUP BY product_id, p.name, p.price;
In this example, the columns product_id, p.name,
and p.price must be in the
GROUP BY clause since they are
referenced in the query select list (but see below). The column
s.units does not have to be in the
GROUP BY list since it is only used in
an aggregate expression (sum(...)),
which represents the sales of a product. For each product, the
query returns a summary row about all sales of the product.
If the products table is set up so that, say, product_id is the primary key, then it would be
enough to group by product_id in the
above example, since name and price would be functionally dependent on the product ID, and so
there would be no ambiguity about which name and price value to
return for each product ID group.
In strict SQL, GROUP BY can only
group by columns of the source table but PostgreSQL extends this to also allow
GROUP BY to group by columns in the
select list. Grouping by value expressions instead of simple column
names is also allowed.
If a table has been grouped using GROUP
BY, but only certain groups are of interest, the
HAVING clause can be used, much like a
WHERE clause, to eliminate groups from
the result. The syntax is:
SELECTselect_listFROM ... [WHERE ...] GROUP BY ... HAVINGboolean_expression
Expressions in the HAVING clause
can refer both to grouped expressions and to ungrouped expressions
(which necessarily involve an aggregate function).
Example:
=>SELECT x, sum(y) FROM test1 GROUP BY x HAVING sum(y) > 3;x | sum ---+----- a | 4 b | 5 (2 rows)=>SELECT x, sum(y) FROM test1 GROUP BY x HAVING x < 'c';x | sum ---+----- a | 4 b | 5 (2 rows)
Again, a more realistic example:
SELECT product_id, p.name, (sum(s.units) * (p.price - p.cost)) AS profit
FROM products p LEFT JOIN sales s USING (product_id)
WHERE s.date > CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '4 weeks'
GROUP BY product_id, p.name, p.price, p.cost
HAVING sum(p.price * s.units) > 5000;
In the example above, the WHERE
clause is selecting rows by a column that is not grouped (the
expression is only true for sales during the last four weeks),
while the HAVING clause restricts the
output to groups with total gross sales over 5000. Note that the
aggregate expressions do not necessarily need to be the same in all
parts of the query.
If a query contains aggregate function calls, but no
GROUP BY clause, grouping still
occurs: the result is a single group row (or perhaps no rows at
all, if the single row is then eliminated by HAVING). The same is true if it contains a
HAVING clause, even without any
aggregate function calls or GROUP BY
clause.
GROUPING
SETS, CUBE, and ROLLUPMore complex grouping operations than those described above are
possible using the concept of grouping
sets. The data selected by the FROM and WHERE
clauses is grouped separately by each specified grouping set,
aggregates computed for each group just as for simple GROUP BY clauses, and then the results returned.
For example:
=>SELECT * FROM items_sold;brand | size | sales -------+------+------- Foo | L | 10 Foo | M | 20 Bar | M | 15 Bar | L | 5 (4 rows)=>SELECT brand, size, sum(sales) FROM items_sold GROUP BY GROUPING SETS ((brand), (size), ());brand | size | sum -------+------+----- Foo | | 30 Bar | | 20 | L | 15 | M | 35 | | 50 (5 rows)
Each sublist of GROUPING SETS may
specify zero or more columns or expressions and is interpreted the
same way as though it were directly in the GROUP BY clause. An empty grouping set means that
all rows are aggregated down to a single group (which is output
even if no input rows were present), as described above for the
case of aggregate functions with no GROUP
BY clause.
References to the grouping columns or expressions are replaced by null values in result rows for grouping sets in which those columns do not appear. To distinguish which grouping a particular output row resulted from, see Table 9.56.
A shorthand notation is provided for specifying two common types of grouping set. A clause of the form
ROLLUP (e1,e2,e3, ... )
represents the given list of expressions and all prefixes of the list including the empty list; thus it is equivalent to
GROUPING SETS (
( e1, e2, e3, ... ),
...
( e1, e2 ),
( e1 ),
( )
)
This is commonly used for analysis over hierarchical data; e.g. total salary by department, division, and company-wide total.
A clause of the form
CUBE (e1,e2, ... )
represents the given list and all of its possible subsets (i.e. the power set). Thus
CUBE ( a, b, c )
is equivalent to
GROUPING SETS (
( a, b, c ),
( a, b ),
( a, c ),
( a ),
( b, c ),
( b ),
( c ),
( )
)
The individual elements of a CUBE
or ROLLUP clause may be either
individual expressions, or sublists of elements in parentheses. In
the latter case, the sublists are treated as single units for the
purposes of generating the individual grouping sets. For
example:
CUBE ( (a, b), (c, d) )
is equivalent to
GROUPING SETS (
( a, b, c, d ),
( a, b ),
( c, d ),
( )
)
and
ROLLUP ( a, (b, c), d )
is equivalent to
GROUPING SETS (
( a, b, c, d ),
( a, b, c ),
( a ),
( )
)
The CUBE and ROLLUP constructs can be used either directly in
the GROUP BY clause, or nested inside
a GROUPING SETS clause. If one
GROUPING SETS clause is nested inside
another, the effect is the same as if all the elements of the inner
clause had been written directly in the outer clause.
If multiple grouping items are specified in a single
GROUP BY clause, then the final list
of grouping sets is the cross product of the individual items. For
example:
GROUP BY a, CUBE (b, c), GROUPING SETS ((d), (e))
is equivalent to
GROUP BY GROUPING SETS (
(a, b, c, d), (a, b, c, e),
(a, b, d), (a, b, e),
(a, c, d), (a, c, e),
(a, d), (a, e)
)
The construct (a, b) is normally
recognized in expressions as a row constructor. Within the
GROUP BY clause, this does not apply
at the top levels of expressions, and (a,
b) is parsed as a list of expressions as described above. If
for some reason you need a
row constructor in a grouping expression, use ROW(a, b).
If the query contains any window functions (see Section 3.5, Section 9.21 and Section 4.2.8), these
functions are evaluated after any grouping, aggregation, and
HAVING filtering is performed. That
is, if the query uses any aggregates, GROUP
BY, or HAVING, then the rows
seen by the window functions are the group rows instead of the
original table rows from FROM/WHERE.
When multiple window functions are used, all the window
functions having syntactically equivalent PARTITION BY and ORDER
BY clauses in their window definitions are guaranteed to be
evaluated in a single pass over the data. Therefore they will see
the same sort ordering, even if the ORDER
BY does not uniquely determine an ordering. However, no
guarantees are made about the evaluation of functions having
different PARTITION BY or ORDER BY specifications. (In such cases a sort
step is typically required between the passes of window function
evaluations, and the sort is not guaranteed to preserve ordering of
rows that its ORDER BY sees as
equivalent.)
Currently, window functions always require presorted data, and
so the query output will be ordered according to one or another of
the window functions' PARTITION
BY/ORDER BY clauses. It is not
recommended to rely on this, however. Use an explicit top-level
ORDER BY clause if you want to be sure
the results are sorted in a particular way.
If you see anything in the documentation that is not correct, does not match your experience with the particular feature or requires further clarification, please use this form to report a documentation issue.