|PostgreSQL 8.3.23 Documentation|
|Prev||Fast Backward||Chapter 28. Reliability and the Write-Ahead Log||Fast Forward||Next|
WAL is automatically enabled; no action is required from the administrator except ensuring that the disk-space requirements for the WAL logs are met, and that any necessary tuning is done (see Section 28.4).
WAL logs are stored in the directory pg_xlog under the data directory, as a set of segment files, normally each 16 MB in size. Each segment is divided into pages, normally 8 kB each. The log record headers are described in access/xlog.h; the record content is dependent on the type of event that is being logged. Segment files are given ever-increasing numbers as names, starting at 000000010000000000000000. The numbers do not wrap, at present, but it should take a very very long time to exhaust the available stock of numbers.
It is of advantage if the log is located on another disk than the main database files. This can be achieved by moving the directory pg_xlog to another location (while the server is shut down, of course) and creating a symbolic link from the original location in the main data directory to the new location.
The aim of WAL, to ensure that the log is written before database records are altered, can be subverted by disk drives that falsely report a successful write to the kernel, when in fact they have only cached the data and not yet stored it on the disk. A power failure in such a situation might still lead to irrecoverable data corruption. Administrators should try to ensure that disks holding PostgreSQL's WAL log files do not make such false reports. (See Section 28.1.)
After a checkpoint has been made and the log flushed, the checkpoint's position is saved in the file pg_control. Therefore, when recovery is to be done, the server first reads pg_control and then the checkpoint record; then it performs the REDO operation by scanning forward from the log position indicated in the checkpoint record. Because the entire content of data pages is saved in the log on the first page modification after a checkpoint, all pages changed since the checkpoint will be restored to a consistent state.
To deal with the case where pg_control is corrupted, we should support the possibility of scanning existing log segments in reverse order — newest to oldest — in order to find the latest checkpoint. This has not been implemented yet. pg_control is small enough (less than one disk page) that it is not subject to partial-write problems, and as of this writing there have been no reports of database failures due solely to inability to read pg_control itself. So while it is theoretically a weak spot, pg_control does not seem to be a problem in practice.