Full Text Searching (or just text search) provides the capability to identify natural-language documents that satisfy a query, and optionally to sort them by relevance to the query. The most common type of search is to find all documents containing given query terms and return them in order of their similarity to the query. Notions of
similarity are very flexible and depend on the specific application. The simplest search considers
query as a set of words and
similarity as the frequency of query words in the document.
Textual search operators have existed in databases for years. PostgreSQL has
ILIKE operators for textual data types, but they lack many essential properties required by modern information systems:
There is no linguistic support, even for English. Regular expressions are not sufficient because they cannot easily handle derived words, e.g.,
satisfy. You might miss documents that contain
satisfies, although you probably would like to find them when searching for
satisfy. It is possible to use
OR to search for multiple derived forms, but this is tedious and error-prone (some words can have several thousand derivatives).
They provide no ordering (ranking) of search results, which makes them ineffective when thousands of matching documents are found.
They tend to be slow because there is no index support, so they must process all documents for every search.
Full text indexing allows documents to be preprocessed and an index saved for later rapid searching. Preprocessing includes:
Parsing documents into tokens. It is useful to identify various classes of tokens, e.g., numbers, words, complex words, email addresses, so that they can be processed differently. In principle token classes depend on the specific application, but for most purposes it is adequate to use a predefined set of classes. PostgreSQL uses a parser to perform this step. A standard parser is provided, and custom parsers can be created for specific needs.
Converting tokens into lexemes. A lexeme is a string, just like a token, but it has been normalized so that different forms of the same word are made alike. For example, normalization almost always includes folding upper-case letters to lower-case, and often involves removal of suffixes (such as
es in English). This allows searches to find variant forms of the same word, without tediously entering all the possible variants. Also, this step typically eliminates stop words, which are words that are so common that they are useless for searching. (In short, then, tokens are raw fragments of the document text, while lexemes are words that are believed useful for indexing and searching.) PostgreSQL uses dictionaries to perform this step. Various standard dictionaries are provided, and custom ones can be created for specific needs.
Storing preprocessed documents optimized for searching. For example, each document can be represented as a sorted array of normalized lexemes. Along with the lexemes it is often desirable to store positional information to use for proximity ranking, so that a document that contains a more “dense” region of query words is assigned a higher rank than one with scattered query words.
Dictionaries allow fine-grained control over how tokens are normalized. With appropriate dictionaries, you can:
Define stop words that should not be indexed.
Map synonyms to a single word using Ispell.
Map phrases to a single word using a thesaurus.
Map different variations of a word to a canonical form using an Ispell dictionary.
Map different variations of a word to a canonical form using Snowball stemmer rules.
A data type
tsvector is provided for storing preprocessed documents, along with a type
tsquery for representing processed queries (Section 8.11). There are many functions and operators available for these data types (Section 9.13), the most important of which is the match operator
@@, which we introduce in Section 12.1.2. Full text searches can be accelerated using indexes (Section 12.9).
A document is the unit of searching in a full text search system; for example, a magazine article or email message. The text search engine must be able to parse documents and store associations of lexemes (key words) with their parent document. Later, these associations are used to search for documents that contain query words.
For searches within PostgreSQL, a document is normally a textual field within a row of a database table, or possibly a combination (concatenation) of such fields, perhaps stored in several tables or obtained dynamically. In other words, a document can be constructed from different parts for indexing and it might not be stored anywhere as a whole. For example:
SELECT title || ' ' || author || ' ' || abstract || ' ' || body AS document FROM messages WHERE mid = 12; SELECT m.title || ' ' || m.author || ' ' || m.abstract || ' ' || d.body AS document FROM messages m, docs d WHERE m.mid = d.did AND m.mid = 12;
Actually, in these example queries,
coalesce should be used to prevent a single
NULL attribute from causing a
NULL result for the whole document.
Another possibility is to store the documents as simple text files in the file system. In this case, the database can be used to store the full text index and to execute searches, and some unique identifier can be used to retrieve the document from the file system. However, retrieving files from outside the database requires superuser permissions or special function support, so this is usually less convenient than keeping all the data inside PostgreSQL. Also, keeping everything inside the database allows easy access to document metadata to assist in indexing and display.
For text search purposes, each document must be reduced to the preprocessed
tsvector format. Searching and ranking are performed entirely on the
tsvector representation of a document — the original text need only be retrieved when the document has been selected for display to a user. We therefore often speak of the
tsvector as being the document, but of course it is only a compact representation of the full document.
Full text searching in PostgreSQL is based on the match operator
@@, which returns
true if a
tsvector (document) matches a
tsquery (query). It doesn't matter which data type is written first:
SELECT 'a fat cat sat on a mat and ate a fat rat'::tsvector @@ 'cat & rat'::tsquery; ?column? ---------- t SELECT 'fat & cow'::tsquery @@ 'a fat cat sat on a mat and ate a fat rat'::tsvector; ?column? ---------- f
As the above example suggests, a
tsquery is not just raw text, any more than a
tsvector is. A
tsquery contains search terms, which must be already-normalized lexemes, and may combine multiple terms using AND, OR, NOT, and FOLLOWED BY operators. (For syntax details see Section 8.11.2.) There are functions
phraseto_tsquery that are helpful in converting user-written text into a proper
tsquery, primarily by normalizing words appearing in the text. Similarly,
to_tsvector is used to parse and normalize a document string. So in practice a text search match would look more like this:
SELECT to_tsvector('fat cats ate fat rats') @@ to_tsquery('fat & rat'); ?column? ---------- t
Observe that this match would not succeed if written as
SELECT 'fat cats ate fat rats'::tsvector @@ to_tsquery('fat & rat'); ?column? ---------- f
since here no normalization of the word
rats will occur. The elements of a
tsvector are lexemes, which are assumed already normalized, so
rats does not match
@@ operator also supports
text input, allowing explicit conversion of a text string to
tsquery to be skipped in simple cases. The variants available are:
tsvector @@ tsquery tsquery @@ tsvector text @@ tsquery text @@ text
The first two of these we saw already. The form
tsquery is equivalent to
to_tsvector(x) @@ y. The form
text is equivalent to
to_tsvector(x) @@ plainto_tsquery(y).
& (AND) operator specifies that both its arguments must appear in the document to have a match. Similarly, the
| (OR) operator specifies that at least one of its arguments must appear, while the
! (NOT) operator specifies that its argument must not appear in order to have a match. For example, the query
fat & ! rat matches documents that contain
fat but not
Searching for phrases is possible with the help of the
<-> (FOLLOWED BY)
tsquery operator, which matches only if its arguments have matches that are adjacent and in the given order. For example:
SELECT to_tsvector('fatal error') @@ to_tsquery('fatal <-> error'); ?column? ---------- t SELECT to_tsvector('error is not fatal') @@ to_tsquery('fatal <-> error'); ?column? ---------- f
There is a more general version of the FOLLOWED BY operator having the form
N is an integer standing for the difference between the positions of the matching lexemes.
<1> is the same as
<2> allows exactly one other lexeme to appear between the matches, and so on. The
phraseto_tsquery function makes use of this operator to construct a
tsquery that can match a multi-word phrase when some of the words are stop words. For example:
SELECT phraseto_tsquery('cats ate rats'); phraseto_tsquery ------------------------------- 'cat' <-> 'ate' <-> 'rat' SELECT phraseto_tsquery('the cats ate the rats'); phraseto_tsquery ------------------------------- 'cat' <-> 'ate' <2> 'rat'
A special case that's sometimes useful is that
<0> can be used to require that two patterns match the same word.
Parentheses can be used to control nesting of the
tsquery operators. Without parentheses,
| binds least tightly, then
! most tightly.
It's worth noticing that the AND/OR/NOT operators mean something subtly different when they are within the arguments of a FOLLOWED BY operator than when they are not, because within FOLLOWED BY the exact position of the match is significant. For example, normally
!x matches only documents that do not contain
x anywhere. But
!x <-> y matches
y if it is not immediately after an
x; an occurrence of
x elsewhere in the document does not prevent a match. Another example is that
x & y normally only requires that
y both appear somewhere in the document, but
(x & y) <-> z requires
y to match at the same place, immediately before a
z. Thus this query behaves differently from
x <-> z & y <-> z, which will match a document containing two separate sequences
x z and
y z. (This specific query is useless as written, since
y could not match at the same place; but with more complex situations such as prefix-match patterns, a query of this form could be useful.)
The above are all simple text search examples. As mentioned before, full text search functionality includes the ability to do many more things: skip indexing certain words (stop words), process synonyms, and use sophisticated parsing, e.g., parse based on more than just white space. This functionality is controlled by text search configurations. PostgreSQL comes with predefined configurations for many languages, and you can easily create your own configurations. (psql's
\dF command shows all available configurations.)
During installation an appropriate configuration is selected and default_text_search_config is set accordingly in
postgresql.conf. If you are using the same text search configuration for the entire cluster you can use the value in
postgresql.conf. To use different configurations throughout the cluster but the same configuration within any one database, use
ALTER DATABASE ... SET. Otherwise, you can set
default_text_search_config in each session.
Each text search function that depends on a configuration has an optional
regconfig argument, so that the configuration to use can be specified explicitly.
default_text_search_config is used only when this argument is omitted.
To make it easier to build custom text search configurations, a configuration is built up from simpler database objects. PostgreSQL's text search facility provides four types of configuration-related database objects:
Text search parsers break documents into tokens and classify each token (for example, as words or numbers).
Text search dictionaries convert tokens to normalized form and reject stop words.
Text search templates provide the functions underlying dictionaries. (A dictionary simply specifies a template and a set of parameters for the template.)
Text search configurations select a parser and a set of dictionaries to use to normalize the tokens produced by the parser.
Text search parsers and templates are built from low-level C functions; therefore it requires C programming ability to develop new ones, and superuser privileges to install one into a database. (There are examples of add-on parsers and templates in the
contrib/ area of the PostgreSQL distribution.) Since dictionaries and configurations just parameterize and connect together some underlying parsers and templates, no special privilege is needed to create a new dictionary or configuration. Examples of creating custom dictionaries and configurations appear later in this chapter.
If you see anything in the documentation that is not correct, does not match your experience with the particular feature or requires further clarification, please use this form to report a documentation issue.