Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Date: 2001-01-19 20:05:08
Message-ID: siae8nfguj.fsf@daffy.airs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Interestingly, we have very few non-gcc ASM entries in s_lock.h. The
> only non-gcc one I see are Univel/i386, and I didn't touch that. Isn't
> the semicolon the standard command terminator for all gcc assemblers?

No.

It is for most, but not for the a29k, AVR, CRIS, d10v, d30v, FR30,
H8/300, HP/PA, TIC30, TIC54x, or TIC80.

Aren't you glad you know that now?

Ian
Former GNU binutils maintainer

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lance Taylor 2001-01-19 20:06:15 Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-01-19 19:58:42 Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator proble ms o n AIX

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lance Taylor 2001-01-19 20:06:15 Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2001-01-19 19:24:10 Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup