Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Date: 2001-01-19 19:24:10
Message-ID: 20010119132410.B2559@lerami.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [010119 13:08]:
>
> > Oh, wow, I never suspected gcc could work without gas. Can it?
>
> Gcc with platform-specific as used to be the standard configuration
> on HPUX, and may still be standard on some platforms.
Still is the standard on UnixWare with GCC. The standard assembler
and linker are used.

>
> Bottom line: I see no point in taking any risks, especially not this
> late in beta, with code that you cannot test for yourself, and
> *especially* not when the change is only for cosmetic reasons.
I agree with this sentiment.

LER

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-01-19 19:37:32 Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2001-01-19 19:13:54 RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lance Taylor 2001-01-19 20:05:08 Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-19 18:49:26 Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup