From: | Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup |
Date: | 2001-01-19 20:06:15 |
Message-ID: | si66jbfgso.fsf@daffy.airs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > I believe the formatting problem was that some code had
> > > "command;command; : lkjasfd : asldfk" while some had them spread over
> > > separate lines, and others used \n\, all very randomly. Now at least
> > > they are all consistent and use similar formatting.
> >
> > And they may all be broken, except for the one(s) you have tested.
> > You shouldn't be assuming that a platform that uses gcc necessarily
> > also uses gas.
>
> Oh, wow, I never suspected gcc could work without gas. Can it?
Yes.
In fact, I don't think there is any Unix system on which gcc requires
gas. There used to be at least one, but I think they have all been
cleaned up at this point.
Ian
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin A. Marques | 2001-01-19 20:23:22 | re-instalation |
Previous Message | Ian Lance Taylor | 2001-01-19 20:05:08 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-19 20:44:15 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup |
Previous Message | Ian Lance Taylor | 2001-01-19 20:05:08 | Re: Re: [PATCHES] s_lock.h cleanup |