Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Date: 2010-11-23 16:58:36
Message-ID: alpine.BSF.2.00.1011231256010.19981@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


Should be fixed now ... confirm?

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Dave Page wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> Why would it?  its cvs, not svn ...
>
> It was a cvsweb installation.
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy(at)hub(dot)org http://www.hub.org

Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy(at)hub(dot)org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-23 17:18:00 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2010-11-23 16:52:35 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?