Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Date: 2010-11-23 16:51:53
Message-ID: AANLkTi=ercDyq71fi+6gGn1nU-C4=dKz2Vqoqf5sNQ15@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Why would it?  its cvs, not svn ...

It was a cvsweb installation.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2010-11-23 16:52:35 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2010-11-23 16:48:36 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?