Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Date: 2010-11-23 16:52:35
Message-ID: 4CEBF153.6080304@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Why would it? its cvs, not svn ...

Well we need the webinterface as well because that is what the
pgsql-hackers archive is pointing too...

Stefan

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2010-11-23 16:58:36 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Previous Message Dave Page 2010-11-23 16:51:53 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?